Today two terms that are being used almost interchangeably are ‘Open Learning’ and ‘Distance Education’ and they are often combined to be known as Open and Distance Learning (ODL). Open learning is a philosophy and Distance Education is the mode used for translating it into reality as the two are complementary to each other.
Distance Education (DE) is an umbrella term which describes all the teaching-learning arrangements in which the learner and the teacher are separated by space and time. In fact it is a mode of delivering education and instruction to learners who are not physically present in a traditional setting of a classroom. Transaction of the curriculum is effected by means of specially prepared materials (self-study (learning) materials) which are delivered to the learners at their doorstep through various media such as print, television, radio, satellite, audio/video tapes, CD-ROMs, Internet and World Wide Web etc. Also a technological medium replaces the inter-personal communication of conventional classroom based education that takes place between the teacher and the learners. Communication between the institution, teacher and learners is mainly through electronic media (telephone, interactive radio counselling,
teleconferencing, videoconferencing, chat sessions, email, website etc) and also through postal
correspondence and limited face to face contact sessions held at Study Centres that are set up by the DE institutions as close to the learners’ homes as possible.
Open learning, which covers a wide range of innovations and reforms in the educational sector that advocates flexibility to the learner with regard to entry and exit; pace and place of study; method of study and also the choice and combination of courses; assessment and course completion. The lesser the restrictions, the higher the degree of openness. The Open learning system aims to redress social or educational inequality and to offer opportunities not provided by conventional colleges or universities. Educational opportunities are planned deliberately so that access to education is available to larger sections of the society.
Thus, ODL is a term which accepts the philosophy of “openness” and uses the “distance mode” of learning
ODL occupies a special place in the Indian higher education system because of its major contribution in
enhancing the gross enrollment ratio and democratization of higher education to large segments of the
Indian population particularly to reach out to the unreached and to meet the demands of lifelong learning
which has become more of a necessity in the knowledge society.
The major objectives of DE system are:
To democratize higher education to large segments of the population, in particular the disadvantaged
groups such as those living in remote and rural areas, working people, women etc.
To provide an innovative system of university-level education which is both flexible and open in
terms of methods and pace of learning; combination of courses, eligibility for enrollment, age of
entry, conduct of examination and implementation of the programmes of study;
To provide an opportunity for up-gradation of skills and qualifications; and To develop education as a lifelong activity to enable persons to update their knowledge or acquire
knowledge in new areas.
India has one of the largest DE systems in the world, second only to China. There are six types of
institutions offering DE today:
- National Open University
- State Open Universities
Distance Education Institutions (DEIs) at-
- Institutions of National Importance
- Central Universities
- State Universities
- Deemed to be Universities
- State Private Universities
- DEIs at Stand alone Institutions
- Professional Associations
- Government Institutions
- Private institutions
- Historical Developments
Five decades ago policy-makers realized the imperative need of DE in order to expand the base of higher education. With the expanding base at the elementary and secondary education levels, the demand for higher education had increased. The University Grants Commission (UGC) suggested in its report for 1956-1960 that proposals for evening colleges, correspondence courses and award of external degrees should be considered. The Planning Commission took serious note of such a need and in its Third Five Year Plan mentioned the need for the introduction of correspondence education in the country. In the light of the observations made by the Planning Commission the Central Advisory Board on Education recommended the setting up of an Expert Committee under the chairmanship of Dr. D.S. Kothari, the then Chairman of UGC, to look into the proposal of introducing correspondence courses.
The Expert Committee recommended the institution of correspondence courses in view of the greater flexibility, economic viability and innovative methods of imparting education. The committee also suggested that correspondence courses in India should be administered by the universities only and in the first instance, by one University, viz., the University of Delhi as a pilot project.
Thus was born in 1962 the University of Delhi’s School of Correspondence Courses and Continuing Education. Subsequently the Education Commission (1964-66), under the chairmanship of Dr. D.S. Kothari, also perceived correspondence education as an answer to the increasing pressure of numbers as well as the growing financial pressures on the universities.
The next decade i.e. the 1970s saw the growth and spread of the Correspondence Education system in India, by more conventional universities opening Correspondence Course Institutes (subsequently renamed as Directorates of Distance Education/ Centres of Distance Education ).
The opportunity of access, affordability and convenience offered by the DE system contributed to its increasing popularity and growth. But again the DE system was plagued by the rigidities of the conventional system.
The Ministry of Human Resource Development in its National Policy on Education (NPE) 1986,
gave prominence to an OU system as a means to “augment opportunities for higher education and as an instrument of democratizing education” Clearly, the vision was that OUs would be different from conventional universities.
Thus a new chapter in DE system began with the establishment of Dr BR Ambedkar Open
University, Hyderabad in 1982, followed by the establishment of Indira Gandhi National Open
University at the national level by the Parliament of India in 1985. The idea was accepted by many states and 1987 saw the emergence of two more Open Universities, namely, Nalanda Open
University (NOU) Patna, Bihar and Vardhman Mahaveer Open University (VMOU), Kota,
Rajasthan. Subsequently, Yashwantrao Chavan Maharashtra Open University (YCMOU), Nashik,
Maharashtra was established in 1989.
The DEC functioned within the broad framework, and the policies laid down by the Board of Management of IGNOU while enjoying a significant measure of autonomy in its operations.
As per the mandate of the DEC and the NPE 1986, which was revised in 1992, the DEC started
interacting with the State Governments for establishing the SOUs in the respective states. As a result of DEC initiatives several State governments established Open Universities. As emphasized in the NPE of 1986 and subsequently Programme of Action in 1992, the OUs adopted a radically different approach to reach the disadvantaged by adopting a variety of media and delivery channels fordissemination of information and knowledge. As a result of this they have been able to make a definite impact on society, and more Indians have access to higher education than ever before.
The Distance Education Council (DEC) took several initiatives for promotion, coordination and
maintenance of standards of open and distance education system in the country. DEC has developed guidelines for regulating the establishment and operation of ODL institutions in the country. In August 2010, the Ministry of Human Resource Development constituted a Committee under the Chairmanship of Prof. Madhava Menon in respect of the regulation of standards of education imparted through distance mode.
In view of the acceptance of the Report submitted by the Madhava Menon Committee by the Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD) and its recommendations for the creation of a new regulatory body for ODL system, the Distance Education Council of India (DECI). The Madhava Menon Committee also decided that as an interim measure, the DEC of IGNOU may be shifted to UGC.
Subsequently, the MHRD issued an order, dated 29th December 2012, transferred the regulatory authority of distance education from IGNOU to UGC. Thereafter, IGNOU notified the repeal and deletion of Statute 28 of IGNOU Act and dissolution of DEC on 1st May 2013. UGC issued an order taking over the physical infrastructure of erstwhile DEC on “as is where is the basis” and the staff working at erstwhile DEC on “deemed deputation basis”. This is an interim measure till such time an independent body namely Distance Education Council of India is created by the Parliament.